The Alliance The Alliance The Alliance

About SBC's first review of our service PDF Print E-mail
Written by Alsazar   
Friday, 25 December 2009 06:43

I've read the review and to be honest I am a bit dissappointed. I was hoping for more emphasis on our results since in 3 months we had more bets and profit that their entire hall of fame in the past year. We are the best and hopefully that will be obvious after their final review, which should come in a few months. Also, we are anxious to appear in their SBCxxTipsterReportSpreadsheet.xls file. About the two issues:

1. We use too many bookmakers

Yep, that's what professional punters do, they have an account with all the bookmakers in order to always get the best odds. One that uses only Pinnacle or w/e is not a professional and cannot hope to maximize his earnings.

2. We gave some horse racing picks that quoted odds at Betfred and this bookmaker tends to limit accounts fast

We haven't had a winner there yet and they don't limit people who never win. Anyway, lately we've adressed this issue. You can see from our history that most of our picks in December were given at Exchange odds.

 

We thank SBC for all their hard work involving reviewing and proofing tips and hopefully we'll improve and the next review will be even better. Unrelated, please check our testimonials section.





Comments (7)
  • |2009-12-26 andry
    one question. so if soccer u feel that it is important for the best odds. then why for horse racing, u dont do the same?

    its contridicting.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-25 Alsazar
    Indeed it might seem so by watching the history. The truth is that not that many bookmakers offer competitive odds for horse racing. The few ones that we quote generally offer the best odds. We rarely take worse odds than the ones available elsewhere.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Anonymous
    if tht is the case. does tht mean the ruby is a losing subscription?
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Alsazar
    No, your statement makes little sense and is unrelated to what was discussed before. Why? If we wouldn't take the best odds, that would mean a punter could win even more than our history suggests by taking the best odds, not the ones that we recommend in our picks.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Alsazar
    Unrelated, anonymous posting is not really anonymous on this website. I can track sessions that started 3 months ago.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Anonymous
    based on SBC review. i am making judgement based on that. it shows you are down.

    yes, u can track, as u can see, i subscribed to platanium and also the golden. i am interested in the ruby. but SBC review, concerns me as it shows ur horses are losing money.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-25 andry
    oh okie i forgot to put in the my contact details. but all written by the same person. andry.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-25 Alsazar
    I've read the review in a hurry; if indeed he says so he's wrong. The second guy that helped Mike by testing our service did not even receive The Ruby and most of Mike's initial review (because it's not a full review) only concentrated on the short period of time in which he received picks from us. When I get back in town I'll read that short review again; I don't have it on my laptop. The full review which will come in a few months will concentrate on the entire period of time proofed by Mike. Anyway we'll give you a two days trial of The Ruby in order to check odds availability and whatnot.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Alsazar
    The Bookie Breaker = The Platinum + The Golden + The Ruby
    1050 = 300 + 100 + 800 (1200)

    1050 is 87.5% of 1200.

    If you subscribe to The Bookie Breaker I'll calculate exactly how much you have left from Platinum and Golden, transform that into money and pay you back the difference. So let's say you subscribe to The Bookie Breaker on January 1 and you got 15 days in the new month already paid from The Platinum and 20 from The Golden. That should translate into 0.875 * (150 EUR + 67 EUR) = 0.875 * 217 EUR =~ 190 EUR. Your payment after receiving that sum back would actually be 1050 - 190 = 860 EUR for The Bookie Breaker in January.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Alexei  - i want...
    i want to do this too obviously. will pay in day 1 of the new year
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 andry
    but they also said u guys want to stop proofing to them. why so?
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-26 Alsazar
    Mike is still proofing us and I considered it should be enough. If I wanted multiple monitors I would have contacted more than one. SBC will suffice.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-27 Alexander
    why do you even care about that initial review is a mystery to me. they're proofing you and that's enough. keep doing what you do!
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-27 Alsazar
    Yes but we're not in SBCxxTipsterReportSpreadsheet yet. That's where I want us to be.
    Reply | Quote
  • |2009-12-27 Medea
    our free picks make more profit than most of the tipsters from that file
    Reply | Quote
  • |2010-01-05 mick
    Can you write here the initial review you talked about?
    Reply | Quote
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
:D:angry::angry-red::evil::idea::love::x:no-comments::ooo::pirate::?::(
:sleep::););)):0
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."